<!--quoteo(post=224160:date=Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM:name=gunsmith)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gunsmith @ Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM) [snapback]224160[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->This part is perfect:<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->NATHANIEL
Ah, the sea; always changing,
never contained.
JACK
That, my friend is the definition
of freedom. I am a man of the
sea...of freedom.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->I don't like that Jack suddenly says "I am a man of the sea... of freedom". I can't see Jack just suddenly saying that. That's why I removed that line and added "You seem to care much for your freedom". To this Jack could then reply "I am a man of the sea... of freedom". Makes a bit more sense to me.
<!--quoteo(post=224160:date=Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM:name=gunsmith)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gunsmith @ Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM) [snapback]224160[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->And this one I dont get:
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->NATHANIEL
Hmh. You long to be free, as do I,
we are all pawns in the greater
chess game.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Pawns and freedom?
Dont get it.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Most people can be considered pawns because they have to do what "the big ones" say. Cutler Beckett in this case. Both Jack and Nathaniel work for Beckett and are thus not free. Instead Edwards thinks they're pawns and don't have any choice. Jack, on the other hand, claims he is a <i>knight</i>, suggesting that he is not merely a pawn, but does have his fate in his own hands. I like it. I'd just change "You long to be free, as do I" into "You long to be free, as do we all". It strikes me as an odd thing to say otherwise. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/unsure.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":?" border="0" alt="unsure.gif" />
<!--quoteo(post=224160:date=Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM:name=gunsmith)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gunsmith @ Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM) [snapback]224160[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->And this one I dont get
ieter - Why would he put Nath in comand of navigation? Altough it would be cool. And the scene at night when Edwards is looking the stars to navigate is cool too.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Perhaps because Jack isn't particularly good at it? See Dead Man's Chest. Particularly with his rum-drinking habits. He doesn't want to screw up on this voyage, so he prefers not to make any accidental detours. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/icon_mrgreen1.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="
" border="0" alt="icon_mrgreen1.gif" />
Another option is that he wants Edwards to prove himself; to see how good he is. And he does need to give Edwards SOMETHING to do. Jack is officially just a captain, Edwards is a Post-Captain, which is officially a higher rank than Jack. So Jack couldn't give Edwards a completely unimportant job. Navigating the ship would be pretty important. Also if Edwards is in charge of navigation, Mercer can't blame Jack if the voyage takes longer than expected.
I also like the idea of seeing Edwards working with his sextant. That adds a bit more interest to a scene that would otherwise just be talking. It also adds some realism and a sense of what things actually need to be done on a ship.
<!--quoteo(post=224160:date=Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM:name=gunsmith)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gunsmith @ Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM) [snapback]224160[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><i>Arival at Africa</i> idea is cool too but we could go without it.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->True; it doesn't really add all that much to the story. I like it though because again it shows how ships were sailed in these days: it adds a sense of historical realism. And it does show Edwards being a very capable officer and would be a reason for Jack to respect him. After all: Edwards and Jack need to respect each other and be friendly to each other, so we must come up with reasons why Edwards respects Jack and why Jack respects Edwards.
<!--quoteo(post=224160:date=Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM:name=gunsmith)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gunsmith @ Dec 3 2007, 10:19 AM) [snapback]224160[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->And I like the Franch pirate idea too.
Altough it sounds funny to join up with someone you were just trying to kill...or I'm wrong.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->They were sailing under the EITC colours, so the French pirate came in to try and steal their cargo. However, the French pirate finds a more worthy and unconventional adversary than he had expected. He knows he can't win, so he surrenders. But he doesn't want to lose completely, so offers Jack to be his partner in a profitable venture. Jack being Jack is tempted by this offer and eventually agrees.