<!--quoteo(post=316064:date=Apr 27 2009, 09:11 AM:name=Estharos)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Estharos @ Apr 27 2009, 09:11 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=316064"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Did you try them in your pant's with that big nosel. A 'brace' should be something that you can conceal and draw easly, with those big nosel it's hard to bring them out easly, most of the time they will hook themself on the pants and your stuck. I don't think it will be realistic a all. Then again it's just my point of view.
One thing we should think about, is that those pistol were quite heavy, that's the reason why they use to put them in they pants or inside there big coat, instead of hooking them on the side of there legs. Less anoying for them since they don't slap on the side of your leg and don't hook themself on anything that you come across to close.
Cheers, <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/par-ty.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="
" border="0" alt="par-ty.gif" /><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
On the contrary, very few pistols of the age were concealable. there was such a thing as a pocket pistol of course, and the autobiograpghy of Donald McBane, one of the most impressive dualists of the early 1700s, mentions them frequently.
McBane primarily dueled to protect his interists in prositution and gambling in the army of his Grace, the Duke of Marlborugh, during Queen Anne's war, also known as the War of the Spainish Succession, and he was extremely concerned over pocket pistols, but then he was a gangster dueling other gansters, who did on occasion pull them when loosing.
This actually happened to him once in his third or fourth duel to 'muscle in' on a group of pimps. after searching each other for concealed firearms, they fought, then the other fellow pulled a pistol out from inside his hat and shot at McBane. The ball came so close it when through his cravat. McBane, thinking himself shot, chased the man down and gave him thrust through the buttocks.
But no, most pistols wouldn't have been particular concealable, nor would the attempt have been made to conceal them.
Now, a brace of pistols has nothing to do with size, it merely means a pair. If you look up Dictionary.com, it litereally means "pair" on entry number 10.
<a href="http://forum.piratesahoy.net//index.php?act=Post&CODE=02&f=37&t=13184&qpid=316064" target="_blank">http://forum.piratesahoy.net//index.php?ac...amp;qpid=316064</a>
What was usually done with pistols is to stick a pair of them through a sash or a swordbelt. Indeed, the British "Sea service pistol" included a large belt clip to hold it in place.
Take a look at these replicas.
<a href="http://www.middlesexvillagetrading.com/NEWess1756.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.middlesexvillagetrading.com/NEWess1756.shtml</a>
Here's a few pictures of originals.
<a href="http://www.vallejogallery.com/item.php?id=1896" target="_blank">http://www.vallejogallery.com/item.php?id=1896</a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11964447@N02/3228269622/" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/11964447@N02/3228269622/</a>
<a href="http://www.goantiques.com/scripts/images,id,1536400.html#" target="_blank">http://www.goantiques.com/scripts/images,id,1536400.html#</a>
Now, they didn't have interchangeable parts back then, but these things adveraged around 14 inches long. You 'could' conceal that, but it wouldn't be the least bit easy, and that's quite a common type for a pistol. I personally tote around a full sized modern pistol from time to time, (I'm licenced to carry,) and my weapon isn't half that long.
So what was usually done is to take a pair, (Or a brace,) of the great big, HUGE pistol of your choice, and stick it through your belt, one on either side. Along with your sword, you were well prepared to rumble. But the sheer size of the pistol didn't limit anyone. Pirates, as I'm sure you know, tended to carry as many as they could get, sticking them everywhere, and inventing the holster to help!
So what's actually unrealistic is having a 'brace' of three of them. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="
" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /> That said, I'm not complaining about the idea of three pistols. Call it a set though, if you want to be realistic.
Still, as historically the size clearly wasn't considered a limiting factor, there's really no 'historical' reason for these grapeshot numbers to be any harder to tote around then the "large pistols' of which we already have braces. You know, the sizes are rather similar anyway.
So we return to the original question. Since it actually isn't unrealistic, why don't we have braces of grapeshot pistols?