• New Horizons on Maelstrom
    Maelstrom New Horizons


    Visit our website www.piratehorizons.com to quickly find download links for the newest versions of our New Horizons mods Beyond New Horizons and Maelstrom New Horizons!

Thagarr's Pirate News!

I saw someone on the news last night who seemed to know a lot about the events in the Gulf of Aden and he said that these pirates are really disgruntled Somalia fishermen <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/pirate2.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p:" border="0" alt="pirate2.gif" /> who have taken up arms and turned to piracy. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thpirateshipff.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":piratesahoy!" border="0" alt="thpirateshipff.gif" /> It has been going on for years and up to this point the ship owners have just been quietly paying the ransoms and the pirates have been letting these ships go. Turns out though that they are making so much money that they have set their sights on bigger prizes <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/urgh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":urgh" border="0" alt="urgh.gif" /> and now these attacks have been thrust into the news. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/pirate3.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p2" border="0" alt="pirate3.gif" />
 
I seen a video one group made when they boarded a Chinese ship - they looked like a bunch of fifteen year-olds! <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="xD:" border="0" alt="laugh.gif" /> Man, I'm in the wrong line of work!
 
Perhaps they should be declarin' an "access fee" tew sail through Somali waters and make it "official" tew collect it! <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":rolleyes:" border="0" alt="rolleyes.gif" />
 
That's what these "fisherman" are calling the ransom's they are getting for these hijacked cargo ships Fred Bob, they say it is simply their way of "collecting fees" for foreign ships illegally fishing Somali territorial waters. It wouldn't surprise me a bit to see that get brought up at the U.N. at some point in the near future either ...typical U.N. socialism. All these "fisherman are is a bunch of thugs with RPG's and machine guns, they pay most of the ransom they collect to their bosses, some of which are radical Muslim terrorists with ties to Al-Qeada. They found out they could make more money hijacking cargo ships than fishing. As always, it's all about the booty! Personally, I think an aircraft carrier task force or two patrolling the waters off Somalia would go a long way in curbing pirate activity. But they would need to be under the proper operational orders to have any real effect. If they start plucking more fat juicy oil supertankers, you just may see that happen.

It looks like Russia has a pretty good proposal for the U.N., which means it will probably not pass the Security Council.
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->November 19, 2008
Security Council to consider strikes on pirate shore bases?

Russia may be planning to go the UN Security Council with a proposal for strikes against shore bases used by Somali pirates.

The Russian Government funded Russia Today English language TV station says that "a source close to the UN Security Council" told RT that it is "considering authorising a raid on bases along the Somali coast. If this happens, armed strikes could target land bases of known pirates threatening ships in the Gulf of Aden."

Of course, the UN Security cannot consider such a step unless a proposal is brought before it and agreed upon.

Meantime, an AP report quotes Russia's Ambassador to NATO Dmitry Rogozin as saying that "NATO, the EU and other stakeholders (should decide) to carry out not a maritime operation, but a land operation that would eradicate pirates bases along the coast."

Ambassador Rogozin is quoted as saying that that, six months ago at a meeting of the Russia-NATO Council, he proposed a combined land operation between Russian and the NATO alliance that would target the pirates.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
original story here :
<a href="http://www.marinelog.com/DOCS/NEWSMMVII/2008nov00192.html" target="_blank">http://www.marinelog.com/DOCS/NEWSMMVII/2008nov00192.html</a>

The US and the UK would probably be about the only two other nations supporting such a plan.
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>U.S. Urges Merchant Ships to Try Steps to Foil Pirates</b>

By THOM SHANKER
Published: November 19, 2008

WASHINGTON — The commander of American and allied naval forces off the coast of Somalia has begun efforts to halt a spike in piracy, urging merchant vessels to sail with armed guards on board and to travel only within lanes now patrolled by warships.

The commander, Vice Adm. William E. Gortney of the United States Navy, said crews of merchant ships were being taught measures that did not involve the use of force to prevent pirates from boarding their vessels.

The techniques include complicated rudder movements and speed adjustments that make it hard for pirate speedboats to pull alongside, as well as simple steps like pulling up ladders that some ships leave dangling for an entire voyage.

Pentagon officials said the growing problem of piracy presented yet another vexing national security threat that could not be solved by force alone, even though increased patrols had reduced the success rate of pirate raids.

Admiral Gortney, commander of the United States Fifth Fleet, with headquarters in Bahrain, said the goal of the more than a dozen warships from different countries now patrolling off Somalia was to prevent piracy. He stressed that there were no plans to mount rescues of the 18 ships and their crews currently being held by pirates.

“The cargo on board does not warrant the risk to the hostages at this particular point,” Admiral Gortney said in an interview here.

The one possible exception is a Ukrainian freighter held by pirates, with cargo including T-72 tanks, rocket-propelled grenades and antiaircraft guns. Any attempt to unload that cargo into Somalia may prompt military action, Pentagon officials said.

As negotiations began for the release of a Saudi-owned supertanker seized by pirates off Somalia, the Indian Navy said Wednesday that one of its warships had fought with would-be hijackers in the Gulf of Aden, sinking one vessel and forcing the pirates to abandon a second.

The rise in pirate attacks in a strategic waterway that carries a third of the world’s fuel supplies has captured global attention. But United States officials say the problem can be resolved only when Somalia is able to curb pirates operating from its shores and the shipping giants take more steps to secure the passage of their cargo.

“The ultimate solution is on the beach — Somalia — assuring security and stability and making sure the conditions that breed pirates are no longer there,” Admiral Gortney said. “Lacking that, the only thing we can do is prevent piracy. And we are doing that as more nations of the world send additional warships to help patrol the waters out there.”<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rest of the story here :
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/washington/20military.html?_r=1" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/washingt...itary.html?_r=1</a>
 
Well, now that these ships are more higher profile (oil tankers and such) the powers in the area are going to be sending out their navies in search of the pirates. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/urgh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":urgh" border="0" alt="urgh.gif" /> The problem with these huge ships is that they are now mostly automated and a crew of only about twenty or so are required to operate them. These pirates can easily overwhelm such a small crew and they certainly are not going to try to fight off the pirates.

I heard yesterday that an Indian frigate blew apart a pirate mother ship <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thpirateshipff.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":piratesahoy!" border="0" alt="thpirateshipff.gif" /> and left it in flames. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/pirate3.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p2" border="0" alt="pirate3.gif" /> This is probably only the beginning now of lots of naval action in the Gulf of Aden and around the Horn of Africa.


Here's the link to the Indian frigate/pirate mother ship battle story. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/duel_pa.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":ixi" border="0" alt="duel_pa.gif" />

<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/11/19/somalia.pirates/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/11/19...ates/index.html</a>
 
Thanks for the link Old Salt, I had posted a different link for the same story on page 3. Definitely the best way to go about stopping these thugs, take out their bases!

<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>
Somali pirates build up defences after ransom demand</b>

Somali pirates built up their defences around a captured Saudi Arabian super-tanker after demanding a $US25 million ransom.

As foreign navies sent warships to Somalia's dangerous waters and shipping companies sought alternative routes, extra clan militia and other fighters were brought in to strengthen security at the pirate lair of Harardhere, residents said.

"Some of them are inside the town and others are taking shelter in a nearby village and can be called if need be," local resident Mohamed Awale said.

He said the fighters had come from neighbouring Gulgudud and Mudug regions.

The Sirius Star, the biggest ship ever hijacked, and its $US100 million load of oil was seized last Saturday (local time) and taken to Harardhere, 300 kilometres north of lawless Somalia's capital Mogadishu.

The pirates on Thursday gave the owners 10 days to pay a $US25 million ransom.

Speaking in an exclusive interview from the tanker, a pirate who identified himself as Mohamed Said threatened "disastrous" consequences should Vela International, shipping arm of the Saudi oil giant Saudi Aramco, fail to comply.

"We are demanding $US25 million from the Saudi owners of the tanker. We do not want long-term discussions to resolve the matter," Said said.

"The Saudis have 10 days to comply, otherwise we will take action that could be disastrous."

He did not specify the threatened action but the 330-metre long tanker is carrying two million barrels of crude oil, close to a quarter of Saudi Arabia's daily output.

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said Wednesday the owners were in talks with the pirates, but Vela International has remained tight-lipped.

Some experts have said that the MV Faina, a Ukrainian ship seized by the same pirates in September with a cargo of tanks and other weaponry, was booby-trapped by the hijacke<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Rest of the story here :
<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/11/21/2426897.htm?section=world" target="_blank">http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/11...m?section=world</a>
 
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>Somali pirates reduce ransom for Saudi ship to $15M: Islamist</b>

Reuters | 11/24/2008 7:20 PM

MOGADISHU - Somali pirates holding a Saudi supertanker after the largest hijacking in maritime history have reduced their ransom demand to $15 million, an Islamist leader and regional maritime group both said on Monday.

The November 15 capture of the Sirius Star -- with $100 million of oil and 25 crew members from Britain, Poland, Croatia, Saudi Arabia and the Philippines -- has focused world attention on rampant piracy off the failed Horn of Africa state.

Scores of attacks this year have brought millions of dollars of ransom payments, hiked up shipping insurance costs, sent foreign naval patrols rushing to the area, and left about a dozen boats with more than 200 hostages still in pirate hands.

The gang had originally been quoted as wanting $25 million to release the Sirius Star, which was captured far from Somali waters about 450 nautical miles southeast of Kenya.

But Islamist spokesman Abdirahim Isse Adow, whose men are in the Haradheere area where the ship is being held offshore, said the demand went down. "Middlemen have given a $15 million ransom figure for the Saudi ship. That is the issue now," he said.

Residents say pirates have taken the ship further out to about 100 km (62 miles) off the coast of central Somalia after Islamist militia poured into the town in search of the pirates.

Adow, who represents the Islamic Courts Union (ICU), says his men are out to confront the pirates and free the Saudi Arabian Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) because it is a "Muslim" ship. But residents say other Islamist militia want a cut of any ransom payment.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rest of the story here :
<a href="http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/world/11/24/08/somali-pirates-reduce-ransom-saudi-ship-15m-islamist" target="_blank">http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/world/11/24/08/...ip-15m-islamist</a>
 
I agree Old Salt, they seem to be doing that a lot lately. But what do they have to loose? Most of the ships they have captured have been ransomed and they have collected a tidy profit! With very few exceptions, they don't have to worry about anyone intervening or trying to put an end to the looting. They even have U.N. and E.U. laws that protect their "Human Rights". There are hardly ever any real consequences for their actions, they simply collect a ransom, buy expensive SUV and party for a week or so, and then move on to the next victim. I just found this editorial, it pretty much sums up why most governments aren't willing to do anything.

<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>Why Don't We Hang Pirates Anymore?</b>

It's a safe bet, dear reader, that the title of this column has caused you to either (a) roll your eyes and wonder, What century do you think we're living in? or (b) scratch your head and ask, Yes, why don't we? Wherever you come down, the question defines a fault line in the civilized world's view about the latest encroachment of barbarism.
[Global View] David Gothard

Year-to-date, Somalia-based pirates have attacked more than 90 ships, seized more than 35, and currently hold 17. Some 280 crew members are being held hostage, and two have been killed. Billions of dollars worth of cargo have been seized; millions have been paid in ransom. A multinational naval force has attempted to secure a corridor in the Gulf of Aden, through which 12% of the total volume of seaborne oil passes, and U.S., British and Indian naval ships have engaged the pirates by force. Yet the number of attacks keeps rising.

Why? The view of senior U.S. military officials seems to be, in effect, that there is no controlling legal authority. Title 18, Chapter 81 of the United States Code establishes a sentence of life in prison for foreigners captured in the act of piracy. But, crucially, the law is only enforceable against pirates who attack U.S.-flagged vessels, of which today there are few.

<b>What about international law? Article 110 of the U.N.'s Law of the Sea Convention -- ratified by most nations, but not by the U.S. -- enjoins naval ships from simply firing on suspected pirates. Instead, they are required first to send over a boarding party to inquire of the pirates whether they are, in fact, pirates. A recent U.N. Security Council resolution allows foreign navies to pursue pirates into Somali waters -- provided Somalia's tottering government agrees -- but the resolution expires next week. As for the idea of laying waste, Stephen Decatur-like, to the pirate's prospering capital port city of Eyl, this too would require U.N. authorization. Yesterday, a shippers' organization asked NATO to blockade the Somali coast. NATO promptly declined.</b>

Then there is the problem of what to do with captured pirates. No international body similar to the old Admiralty Courts is currently empowered to try pirates and imprison them. The British foreign office recently produced a legal opinion warning Royal Navy ships not to take pirates captive, lest they seek asylum in the U.K. or otherwise face repatriation in jurisdictions where they might be dealt with harshly, in violation of the British Human Rights Act.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rest of the story here :
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122757123487054681.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1227571234...=googlenews_wsj</a>

Back to one of the few exceptions, the Indian Navy just released a picture of the pirate mother ship they blew up the other day, it made for a pretty good fireball!

<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>Dramatic pic of Indian Navy sinking pirate 'mother ship'</b>

It was one of the notorious Somali pirates' first defeats - and now the Indian Navy has released spectacular evidence of their sinking of a hostile ship.
Indian Navy frigate INS Tabar

The vessel, reportedly a pirate 'mother ship', exploded after an exchange with the Indian frigate INS Tabar in the Gulf of Aden near Somalia a week ago.

When the pirates opened fire, the captain of the Indian vessel retaliated, hit the ship straight on, and it burst into flames and sank.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rest of the story and pic here:
<a href="http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/world-news/2008/11/25/dramatic-pics-of-indian-navy-frigate/exploding-and-sinking-somali-pirate-ship.html" target="_blank">http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/...irate-ship.html</a>
 
Hmmmmm... Maybe India should leave scuttling pirate ships to the French...

<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>Sunken 'pirate ship' was actually Thai trawler, owner says </b>

BANGKOK, Thailand (CNN) -- Fourteen sailors are still missing from a Thai trawler that was sunk last week by the Indian navy as a suspected pirate ship, the vessel's owner said Tuesday.
Indian navy frigate INS Tabar

One crewman was found alive after six days adrift in the Gulf of Aden, and one is confirmed dead, said Wicharn Sirichaiekawat, owner of the Ekawat Nava 5.

Last week, India's navy reported that the frigate INS Tabar had battled a pirate "mother vessel" in the gulf November 18, leaving the ship ablaze and likely sunk. Wicharn said that vessel was his ship, which was in the process of being seized by pirates when it came under fire.

Indian authorities insisted that their ship had acted against a pirate vessel which had threatened to attack the Tabar.

"We fired in self-defense and in response to firing upon our vessel. It was a pirate vessel in the international waters and its stance was aggressive," Commodore Nirad Sinha, a navy spokesman, told CNN. He said the ship the Tabar fired upon was laden with ammunition. Video Watch more about the piracy threat in the region »

Wicharn told reporters that the Ekawat Nava 5 was headed from Oman to Yemen to deliver fishing equipment when it was set upon by pirates off the Horn of Africa. The pirates were seizing control of the ship when the Tabar moved in, he said.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rest of the story, pics and video here :
<a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/11/25/thai.trawler.india.navy/#cnnSTCText" target="_blank">http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/1...avy/#cnnSTCText</a>

And yet another pirate attack...
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>Pirates strike again off Somalia; ship from Yemen seized</b>
NAIROBI, Kenya (CNN) -- A Yemeni freighter has become the latest commercial vessel to be attacked in the pirate-plagued Gulf of Aden, a Kenyan maritime official said Tuesday.

The last contact with the ship was late last week, and it was unclear exactly when the hijacking took place, said Andrew Mwangura, the head of Kenya Seafarers Association.

No further details about the ship, its crew or cargo were immediately available, said Mwangura, whose organization keeps tabs on the welfare of sailors captured by the pirates.

Dozens of ships have been attacked in the Gulf of Aden by pirates based in largely lawless Somalia in recent months.

This has led to calls from commercial ship owners for a military blockade along the coast of Somalia to intercept pirate vessels heading out to sea.

Peter Swift, managing director of the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners, said stronger naval action -- including aerial and aviation support -- is necessary to battle rampant piracy in the region.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Original story here :
<a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/11/25/somalia.pirates.yemen/index.html" target="_blank">http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/1...emen/index.html</a>
 
Turns out the leader of the Somali pirates is a former gas station owner from Ottawa. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="xD:" border="0" alt="laugh.gif" /> Heard that on the news this morning.
 
<img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="xD:" border="0" alt="laugh.gif" />
 
The former owner of an Esso gas station, I might add...Esso, who is the company that happens to own the oil tanker...the plot thickens... <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/389_robber.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":robber:" border="0" alt="389_robber.gif" />
 
Stallion, I am beginning to think your nut job conspiracy theory isn't so nutty! Maybe these journalists were about to report the whole truth! <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/unsure.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":?" border="0" alt="unsure.gif" />

<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>From The Times
November 27, 2008
Two journalists kidnapped as they tried to leave pirate coast</b>
Rob Crilly in Nairobi

Two Western journalists have been kidnapped on Somalia’s lawless pirate coast, apparently victims of the latest in a series of attacks targeting foreigners for cash.

Officials in the port city of Bossasso said that a British reporter and a Spanish photographer were seized along with two local journalists as they tried to leave their hotel and catch a flight out. They had been reporting on Somalia’s pirate gangs, whose hideouts are dotted around the region of Puntland.

“We have reports saying that two foreign journalists were kidnapped with two local journalists. The two foreigners are British and Spanish,” Abdulkebir Musa, Puntland’s Assistant Minister for Seaports, said. No one had admitted responsibility.

The manager of the International Village hotel, named as Abdullahi, said that the two foreign journalists had left to catch a flight to Djibouti but did not arrive at the airport. “They were picked up by their fixer and the same security men who had been looking after them,” he said. “Then an air-line officer at the airport called me to ask where they were because they didn’t show up. This is when I understood they had probably been kidnapped.”

Two freelance journalists, an Australian and a Canadian, are still being held after being seized in Mogadishu in August. Four aid workers with Action Against Hunger were kidnapped in Dhusa Mareb this month. Another Briton, Murray Watson, was taken in April while working in Puntland.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rest of the story here :
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article5240953.ece" target="_blank">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/worl...icle5240953.ece</a>
 
This is getting far too suspicious. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/yes.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":yes" border="0" alt="yes.gif" /> Too many things that could be related to one another. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="xD:" border="0" alt="laugh.gif" />
 
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>
British crew escape pirate hijack</b>

Two British security guards have jumped overboard from a chemical tanker seized by Somali pirates in the Gulf of Aden, British diplomats have said.

The men, along with another crew member, were picked up from the sea by a German naval helicopter.

The Liberian registered vessel, which has at least 28 crew, is now thought to be under the control of pirates.

There have been almost 100 attacks on ships by pirates off east Africa so far this year.

The British High Commission in Nairobi said: "The MV Biscaglia was attacked this morning.

"The three men were picked up by a German naval helicopter and taken to a French warship. They are now safely on board."

The International Maritime Bureau said the Liberian-flagged tanker was hijacked early on Friday in the Gulf of Aden.

The vessel was captured in the same waters where many of the recent hijackings have taken place, the narrow shipping lane between Somalia and Yemen.

More than a dozen ships are currently being held to ransom, including the Saudi-owned super tanker the Sirius Star, which has two British crew on board.

However, pirates have released a Greek freighter and her Filipino crew, who were all reported to be "in good condition" by a Philippines official.

The Centauri is now on its way to Mombasa in Kenya.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Original story here :
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7754433.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7754433.stm</a>

<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>
Sierra Leone navy battles pirates</b>

Four men have been killed after Sierra Leone's navy acted against a pirate attack, police say.

A group of pirates from neighbouring Guinea opened fire on a Chinese fishing vessel, the Shanghai Three, police spokesman Ibrahim Samura told the BBC.

He said following the intervention of the navy, two pirates were shot dead and two men believed to be Guinean soldiers drowned.

A BBC reporter says pirate attacks are rare in West Africa, outside Nigeria.

At least four alleged pirates, from Guinea and Sierra Leone, were arrested.

"The pirates boarded the vessels... and put the crew under gunpoint. We responded to a distress call from one of the vessel's captains and a three-hour battle ensued," Mr Samura said.

The fishing boat's Chinese and Sierra Leonean crew was unharmed.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rest of the story here :
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7753939.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7753939.stm</a>
 
Pirates of the South Caribbean!
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>Guyana: Fishermen released after pirate attack</b>
Associated Press

GEORGETOWN, Guyana -- Pirates have seized a fishing vessel off the coast of South America, looting it of fuel and fish and setting its five crew members adrift in a small boat.

The Guyana Defense Force said Friday the crew members have reached shore and the emptied fishing boat has been found, though the pirates are still at large.

The Atlantic coast off Suriname and Guyana has been plagued by piracy, prompting Guyana's parliament to pass a bill toughening laws against the crime. The president has not yet signed the measure that would allow life in prison for piracy and the death penalty for murder in the course of a pirate attack.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
original story here:
<a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/haiti/story/791281.html" target="_blank">http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/h...ory/791281.html</a>
 
Some security guards dem limey fellers be! <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/mybad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":facepalm" border="0" alt="mybad.gif" />
 
They were securing their own asses Fred Bob! <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="xD:" border="0" alt="laugh.gif" />
 
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>
Pirates target luxury liner</b>
Article from: The Courier-Mail

December 02, 2008 08:30pm

A LUXURY cruise ship with up to 50 Australians on board has been fired on by Gulf of Aden pirates who came within a few hundred metres of the giant liner.

The Sun online reports that one of two small pirate skiffs got within 300 metres of the six-star Oceania Nautica and fired eight rifle shots at the tourist vessel, which escaped by outrunning the smaller craft.

The ship, carrying 690 passengers - reportedly including up to 50 Australians - and 386 crew, was passing fishing boats when the pirate vessels tried to intercept it in the Gulf of Aden, between Somalia and Yemen.

Sky News reports that the ship was readying a high-tech anti-piracy device which can shatter the eardrums of would-be boarders.

The so-called Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) was readied during the attack, but not deployed.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Original story here:
<a href="http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,24737156-5006301,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0...5006301,00.html</a>
 
Back
Top